Worked example

The AI value framework applied to learning and development

The three paths to value, worked through one function. In L&D all three are live at once, and the third one changes who does the work rather than how fast it goes.

The three paths in learning and development

The three paths sort AI use cases by what changes for the person on the receiving end. Each one is taken in turn below, with the point where it stops.

Boosting productivity: the same work, faster

This is where most functions start, and it is a real gain. It is also where most stop, which is the failure mode the framework is built to catch: tools rolled out, workflows unchanged.

Creating new value: something the function could not offer before

These are new offerings rather than faster versions of old ones. The test is whether a learner could have got the same thing before and simply waited longer. If they could, it belongs on the first path.

Driving disruption: who does the work changes

This path is uncomfortable because it puts the function’s own shape in scope, including which parts are bought in. It is also where the durable advantage sits, and it is the reason the three paths are scored separately rather than ranked against each other.

How this is delivered

Use-case discovery does this on your own use cases and leaves a prioritized portfolio with the reasons for what did not make the cut.

Further reading: Amir Elion writes about AI in organizational learning at amirelion.com.

Related: The AI value framework · AI Advisory: Strategy, Enablement and Adoption

See where you are with AI30 minor send a message